Office
1. The 4 principles
The principle of construction by soil and water:
Whether in urban, peri-urban or rural areas, we work with natural elements: water, vegetation, soil and its different strata. The culture of OLM is to be very interested in levelling and micro-topography as a soil architecture that determines how to build, walk, plant and drain rainwater.
The work of levelling is conceived as the concrete interface between the top and the bottom, by folds, breaks, flattens. While referring to the question of geographical territory by level curves, levelling allows the project to "land". The topography is more than a smooth surface and should rather be viewed through all the energies that continually transform it. It's a production surface "with tectonic power. These energies can be runoff or groundwater, wind turbulence, soil chemistry or slope direction. These flows offer a wide range of design possibilities if they are thought together in their prospective capacity. Frédéric Nantois talks about the difference of going from a "territorial geography of flow, from a stable object to an unstable process". The objective is to bring about the fusion of these dynamics to constiture the space project.
The principle of construction by time and uses:
The tillage of the soil and natural elements gives a very special value to the time in the project: where one necessarily works by phases in the urban project, the landscape extends this data by taking it infinitely beyond the limits of the time of urbanization. Much more than designing a landscape delivered at a given time, we must give it the foundation of conditions that will allow it to develop. This also applies to the attention paid to uses on public space: thinking through uses implies not to «overload» space through programming, but rather to give everyone the means to flourish and evolve in public space short, medium and long term.
But also, and even before the project takes place, the prefiguration, the «zero landscape» (Michel Desvigne) can begin to transform the gaze on a place. In the search for a measured intervention on the landscape, we systematically try to change in advance the views on the place to transform its uses, before seeking to modify its structure.
However, to reveal is not to project, and we think that we should not fall into the reverse excess by operating only partially on certain landscapes: depending on the stakes, It is important to study the impact of the intervention on a case-by-case basis, looking at the historical trajectory of the site and its future planning.
“I firmly believe, I admit, that the value of history depends on what it teaches us about the future.” Jackson, J.B. (2003), A la découverte du paysage vernaculaire, Arles: Actes Sud (1st ed. In the United States in 1984) (p. 42)
The principle of construction by scales and paths:
Whatever its scale, the site, the plot, the urban entity, is necessarily the starting point and landing point of the project. We find a special attachment to projects that allow us to transcend scales: where a small-scale site allows us to “see far” and “do great”, or, on the contrary, when we think about the habitability of places and infrastructures that have not been designed for domestic scale.
The routes, whether they are linked to the passage of wildlife in a bio-corridor, to cyclists in a cycling plane, or to the pendulous flows of a road infrastructure, are the objects and means of links (or breaks) between local and territorial scales.
This work of links and places, begun with David Mangin on the former airport of St-Exupéry in Toulouse Montaudran has led us to consider the routes as links but also places around which spaces are organized. At the urban scale, we question the principle of construction based as much on the design of places connected by paths as on the design of flows that organize spaces between them.
2. The team
Cultures and know-how that make it possible to carry out studies and missions of prime contractor
Philippe Coignet
Founder, landscape architect
Guillaume Boehm
Landscape architect
Floriant Bonny
Landscape architect
Camille Dandelot
Public spaces designer
Claire Denic
Architect
Lucile de Gori
Architect
Ahyoung Gu
Landscape architect
Alice Hallynck
Architect and city planner
Agnès Languedoc
Assistant
Emmanuelle Lévêque
Architect and city planner
Rocco Marafatto
Landscape architect
Yoann Munier
Landscape architect
Elise Triacca
Architect and city planner
Silvia Zagheno
Landscape architect
3. The objective
We observe that the concept of urbanism is often stated as an urban form in which the public space is conceived either as an autonomous piece of architecture, or as the result of the unrolling of a road gauge that gives benchmarks but that standardizes the places.
Where the theories of architecture and urbanism are numerous and help in the reading of their History, and in the understanding of the forms and places they generate, there are only a few writings that synthesize the approach of the great designers of the landscape and their project philosophy. However, we seek to situate ourselves through certain research, in order to continue the experience of the landscape as a means of anticipating and accompanying «urbanization», the desire to inhabit the land, to conceive the habitable space, to inscribe the project in a narrative (historical and/or geographical) while trying to anticipate climate change on our lifestyles.
“In other words, because of the passage of time, landscape decontextualizes its artifactuality and takes on the appearance of something natural.”
Corner, J. (1999) Recovering Landscape, New york : Princeton Architectural Press (p.157)
4. Our clients
Grand Paris
France
Alter Public (49)
Amaterra SPL (Corse)
International
Ville de Bruxelles (BE)
Ville de Lausanne (CH)
5. Press
2022
Traits Urbains n°132
Caserne des Minimes - Eole Evangile - 2022
A+299 (en)
Usquare - 2022
2021
A+290
Usquare - 2021
2018
ArchiSTORM (en)
Lot 07 - 2018
2016
Airport Landscape (en)
Helenikon - Grèce
2015
Traits urbains (en)
Rue Nationale - Tours
Traits urbains (en)
Parkway E40 - Bruxelles
AMC (en)
Saint-Germain-lès-Arpajon
2013
Lanscape architecture (en)
Présentation OLM
Expression paysagère (en)
Toulouse et Meudon
2009
L'enjeu capital(es) (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
Architecture durable (en)
Boulogne-Billancourt
Design Ecologies (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
2008
Giardini (en)
Jardin Métis - Canada
Expression paysagère (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
AMC (en)
Najap
d'A (en)
Halle Pajol
New Landscape (en)
Jardin Métis - Canada
Le Moniteur (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
Najap (en)
Najap
2007
Transit (en)
Erosion et temporalité
Hybrids (en)
Jardin Métis - Canada
Magok waterfront (en)
Magok - Corée
Fieldwork (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
C3 (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
Paisajismo (en)
Jardin Métis - Canada
2006
Domus (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce
Topos (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce 2005
Topos (en)
Hellenikon - Grèce 2004